itmustbedons.com AFC Wimbledon Unofficial Site

Welcome To The itmustbedons.com Guestbook

Thank you for visiting my site. If you haven't signed the guestbook yet, please sign my guest book.

Please remember that this is a family based site and so keep all laungauge at a decent level. Anything written that I do not like will be altered but the basis will be the same.

If you wish to see the history of the guestbook please click here.

Don,Don, of course he looked to be lacking confidance in his last season, but I think that was becouse of where DA wanted him to play, completly in the wrong place, and the amount of bad tackles he was involved in.
andyneale ( a wansdworth don)
- Saturday, December 31, 2005 at 04:30:13 (PST)

I know Dave is his real name but I always thought of him as Harry when he was with us. It reminds me of only fools and horses when trigger used to call Rodney-Dave which I think is cool and shows the type of club we are. Dinner with Dave sounds like you are going to have a sit down with Dave Andewrson. Anyway sounds like its going to a great evening.
Andrew
San Diego, CA USA - Friday, December 30, 2005 at 14:40:05 (PST)

Andy:Sully was good for that period in our history but I couldnt see him doing much in this league to be honest
Dave
- Friday, December 30, 2005 at 13:16:12 (PST)

Come on guys get real.Sulley is good club man but the fact of the matter is that he was only good in the CCL. Don't get me wrong I liked Sulley for his approach and raport with the fans but he was inconsistent. Yes - we saw the odd glimpse of brilliance but not on a regular basis. He certainly looked to be lacking confidence in his last season. Good luck to you Sulley and look forward to seeing you here to support the Dons when u get a free weekend.
don don
- Friday, December 30, 2005 at 10:34:54 (PST)

Dave, don't you start, Sully average, you must be joking, a good winger, good at passing the ball into the box, good at corners, a lot more than some of the players we have at the moment, so PLEASE leave him alone.
andyneale ( a wansdworth don)
- Friday, December 30, 2005 at 07:06:01 (PST)

Andrew - Official Flyer is 'Dinner With Dave' also dave is his name Harry just a nickname.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Friday, December 30, 2005 at 05:18:18 (PST)

Dobbo would have been a great long term assett I think and about as good as Harvey who I believe is good. Sully - very average IMO
Dave H
- Friday, December 30, 2005 at 04:53:00 (PST)

Yes he is more versatile at playing badly in more positions than any one else. It would not be so bad if JT had not confidenmtly told us that he was one of the best players outside the Leagues.
Richard B another Wiltshire Don
- Friday, December 30, 2005 at 01:27:20 (PST)

Dinner with dave. Shouldn't that be dinner with Harry?
Andrew
San Diego, ca San Diego - Thursday, December 29, 2005 at 18:39:31 (PST)

WOW. What a reaction. Woolner is more reliable & a team player than Harvey. Yep a formation shuffle would be needed, but Micky has more versatility than other squad members which comes at a price but that is the point of team games.
epsom don
- Thursday, December 29, 2005 at 17:32:28 (PST)

At his best Woolner could challenge for a place in the side, but he has been poor in most recent outings. Glad to see Urse back. We need to get more goals from midfielders. Cannot only rely on Buts and Smeltz.
Don Worn
- Thursday, December 29, 2005 at 09:08:52 (PST)

Richard B, leave sully out of it, he could run rings around half the players out there, as DA could'nt see what an assett he was to the club, thats when my opinion of DA took a dive, SO LEAVE SULLY ALONE................
andyneale ( a wansdworth don)
- Thursday, December 29, 2005 at 04:32:40 (PST)

Woolner instead of Harvey?!? or indeed instead of anyone?!? So what is it that he has compared with Harvey? He can't play on the left, he has no pace, he cannot cross and a total lack of ability in passing to a team mate or getting a shot within satelitte range of the goal. No Micky has probably played his last meaningful game for the club and if he had not been one of DA's first signings he would have gone some time ago. It is a hard thing to say but this is in teh same fantasy of people who thought Bolger and Sullivan were great players.
Richard B another Wiltshire Don
- Thursday, December 29, 2005 at 02:58:28 (PST)

Epsom Don - you are talking out of your backside. Tell me the last time Woolner had a good game? I can't imagine him playing at left back or left midfield. The only positions he has done okay at are central midfield and sweeper/ central defence BUT only when we are short!!!! Sorry Micky but you need to prove me wrong. Admittedly you need a run in the team.
don don
- Thursday, December 29, 2005 at 00:58:44 (PST)

Just read Derek Chaplin comments on boxing day and agree wholeheartly. One thing I would say is I would prefer Michael Woolner to Harvey. In my opinion this would change the shape but the combination of a more consistant formation and bite without any loss of standard which is a must. The dark horse is Simon Sweeney, once fit there may be changes or options. That is not to forget there are also the current young fringe players who may be first choice this time next season
epsom don
- Wednesday, December 28, 2005 at 16:52:57 (PST)

The Goal of the Month poll for November has a few more days to run yet and is being led by Shane Smeltz and his goal against Redbridge with 55% of the vote. Please visit www.ayorkshirewomble.com to cast your votes.
WakefieldWomble
- Tuesday, December 27, 2005 at 05:39:54 (PST)

Good on you Paul, by the way it is a great site, so keep it up, love the banter.
andyneale (a battersea don)
- Tuesday, December 27, 2005 at 04:55:00 (PST)

Another cracking game and no losses in the league since mid november. Club in crisis, YOUR HAVING A LAUGH!!! Keep it up wombles and thankyou Paul for not rising to some of the rubbish people write. No wonder jonesy closed weird and wonderful.
jakedon11
- Tuesday, December 27, 2005 at 04:21:07 (PST)

AndyN - I watched from Tempest end for the first game it opened, it's not the easiest place to do update from for the unfortunate people who are not able to get to the game, but will see what I can do.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Tuesday, December 27, 2005 at 02:57:03 (PST)

Great result - lets have 3 or 4 wins on a spin. Playoffs are possible!
Dave H
- Tuesday, December 27, 2005 at 02:22:10 (PST)

Happy christmas everyone, thats the niceties out of the way.Great to see Chriss get the man of the match award, totally agree with it. Just wish alot of the other players put as much effort into it. Also lets put a stop to all this crap about the Dons draw, if we can't trust the board to run this, than we are heading for trouble, so lets have the final word on it. THANKS. Paul, love to see you come and stand with us in the stands and watch a proper game or lack of it, come on, accept the challange at the next home game and join us. I dare you!
andyneale ( a wansdworth don)
- Tuesday, December 27, 2005 at 02:19:38 (PST)

Walton & Hersham highlights now on http://www.donsonline.co.uk/php/index.php
Strawberry <strawberry@donsonline.co.uk>
- Monday, December 26, 2005 at 15:17:20 (PST)

I'm reading a lot about lack of entertainment and people staying away until it improves. How will they know if they only read the papers or web pages? I'm sure we've all been to games where the reports are nothing like we've witnessed. The W&;H message board has a major moan from some person who obviously needs to get out more about today's officials being the worst he's seen. I'm sure I only have to go back to the St.Albans game to find three who would not be able to hold a candle to today's officials. It's all what we perceive ourselves. Today's side would be pretty much my first choice from the current squad and I thought the first half was pretty entertaining and the second was not far behind..if we had taken some of the chances instead of trying to walk it in, then the result could have been 4 or 5 and we'd all have gone home singing the praises. I'm not a great DA fan, but with injuries and suspensions all over the first half of the season, I'd be happy at 6th place with just over half the season gone and only two teams we've played have impressed me so far. Let's all get behind the team, try to get back those who have stopped coming for whatever reason and make an honest judgement at the end of the season when we know where we stand. And to the person who says we need 3 RB's in our team, today we had them. Gelly, Daly and Big Butts at least were a major improvement over recent weeks, Sarge gets better each week and Shane is beginning to get it right in his mind and is now running into good form.
Derek Chaplin <Derek@Chaplin72.freeserve.co.uk>
- Monday, December 26, 2005 at 13:43:43 (PST)

Blimey. Someone mentioned to me today that some utter nonsense had been posted on here so I came to have a look. Lost for words to be honest. What a great way to try to put hard-working volunteers off putting their money into the Trust and Club via the Dons Draw. Good job Paul is way to much of a decent fella to take any notice.
Kris <kris.stewart@afcwimbledon.co.uk>
- Monday, December 26, 2005 at 13:15:49 (PST)

Oh and well done the lads on a terrific win. It's noticable that when we lose or draw there any number of people who can't get on here quick enough to moan but aren't big enough to contragulate DA and the team when they beat an inform well placed team
Rick
- Monday, December 26, 2005 at 13:15:17 (PST)

Sandy, and your point is????
Rick
- Monday, December 26, 2005 at 13:11:47 (PST)

Hi Paul. Just bought a laptop for home use and when I try to access the matchday updates I am told "Request for syndicated match updates denied". I can stil access via my main PC. Any idea how I can fix this?
Hove Matt
- Monday, December 26, 2005 at 08:16:10 (PST)

Rick. Look at Grays
sandy
- Monday, December 26, 2005 at 04:50:01 (PST)

Don't know what people on here are complaining about, after 2 consecutive promotions to be where we are now is about as good as any reasonable person has a right to expect, infact given our on going injury levels it's bloody amazing.
Rick
- Monday, December 26, 2005 at 04:46:01 (PST)

DA talks a good game on the OS, I just hope it dosen't go flat like so many times before,even do I won't be there for the first time in a couple of years, (since the club don't care about my £9), as I said before I'm staying away until I feel the club starts to care about the fans a little more.And the players we have start to play with a bit more heart, all I can say if we had another 3 RB's, I want be saying this.
sandy
- Monday, December 26, 2005 at 03:58:50 (PST)

Paul, I admire your blind loyalty but the fact that people don't care about the club is not the issue. The fact that we made such a basic mistake is what worries me and the fact we have been called up by the FA for irregularities is also very worrying. I truly believe that the people running this club are out of their depth as none of them had experience of football before we started and have not listened to wise counsel from those with experience before. Dave Anderson is a point in case. The board had two advisors at the time of the search for a new manager and advised that John Rains would be the best man for the job as he was local and had a great track record and even better at man management, but the board ignored all that and went for DA. Speaking to some of the player who have left this club, DA is just a bully who shouts at them intead of encouraging. Matt York for example was treated like dirt as he approached Carshalton to ask if they wanted him back and told Matt by phone at four in the afternoon that he was training with Carshalton that evening. A really nice way to treat an honest bloke who was gutted that he had been dumped.
Worried Don
- Monday, December 26, 2005 at 03:17:19 (PST)

I have seen the accusations about the Dons Draw being fixed. I would add the following comments. Firstly the comment that Jonsey has won the draw is false - he is a DT board member and is not allowed to enter. Secondly, Macca says 6 high profile winners out of 38 winners is fixed. There have been 16 draws to date and 3 cash prizes in every draw so that makes 48 prizes not 38! Also the basic fact is that the volunteers and those dedicated to the club tend to have larger stakes in the draw each month than the average, so someone who has taken 25 tickets each month for £50 per month will have 25 times more chance of winning than someone else putting in £2 each month. Each and every draw is reconciled down to the last ticket and in 16 draws we have not made one mistake, every ticket paid for is included in the draw, and for the few who have withdrawn from the draw, their numbers are excluded from the draw. Anyone wanting to "audit" all the backup documentation to the Dons Draw is welcome to. Any other questions can be addressed to donsdraw@thedonstrust.org as indicated on the O/S. Thanks for reading.
John Owen <onyxgrey@hotmail.com>
- Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 11:25:03 (PST)

Great website Paul, and a merry christmas to all dons supporters.
Klaas
Netherlands - Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 05:00:48 (PST)

Macca, really you should do some research before posting such an accusation. For example is the population of draw winners statistically similar to the draw entrants? I don't know the answer, but if I had a conecrn I would try and find out before rushing to the keyboard ....
Rodent <rodent@aol.com>
Fatboys, KM Slurrey - Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 02:13:25 (PST)

The fact that we budgeted to exit each cup at the first attempt is pretty irrelevant, unless you're into endless comparisions between actual and budgeted income of course. The fact is that POTENTIAL income is lost to the club. I do wish people would stop using the old chestnut quoted earlier .... oh and merry christmas folks ... ;-)
Rodent <rodent@aol.com>
Fatboys, KM Surrey - Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 00:02:16 (PST)

how sad to calculate a percentage and dub known names and accuse the Dons Trust of cheating - shame on you macca
nicky
- Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 16:24:37 (PST)

I see, so 38 prizes and 6 going to "known names" 16% I think this should be drawn at an independent source then we will know that it is truly independent, it will give the rest of us a chance of winning cos we pays our money too. I guess it beats getting a nice card from the club
Macca <macca@hotmail.com>
- Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 13:04:38 (PST)

Yes but all cup revenues would be extra funding to repay the debt! Just because its not budgeted for doesnt make it not worthwhile...Also it would be NICE to win games and even a trophy eg Woking
Dave
- Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 12:46:44 (PST)

Just looked back on the o/s and during 2005 The Dons Draws has offered 38 prizes and by my reckoning 6 of them have gone to known names/volenteers and only two prizes were 1st prize.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 12:03:20 (PST)

As has previously been mentioned the loss in Budgeted cup revenue is 0 as it is always Budgeted that we are drawn away and go out in the first game of each competition.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 10:50:41 (PST)

May be Dave picks the players out of a hat like the Dons Draw
Lurker
- Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 10:42:18 (PST)

There is no way any draw is fixed so lets not go down that route. However, the football side of things is worrying especially with the loss of fans through the gate and loss of revenue in cup competitions (in games we should be winning to be honest). Anderson needs to improve results or go. Simple
Dave Hill
- Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 10:41:08 (PST)

Do they pik numbers out of a hat? Do they use spreadsheets?
Lurker
- Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 10:40:03 (PST)

Sandy - Utter tosh was on a different subject.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 10:39:59 (PST)

With regard to the Dons Draw, the last one was witnessed by DT Chair Tom Adam and having seen the method, I would suggest it is impossible to fix the results.
laurence <laurence@cool-net.co.uk>
Sutton, - Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 10:36:00 (PST)

No Paul, is not utter tosh, I,m sure that in most cases you must be watching a different game from the rest of us, you never have a bad thing to say, and going back to Tuesday's game I think that watching paint dry was more interesting than what I had to endure. And I for one will be voting with my feet until the team start to entertain,even if they don't always win. So there is another £9 the club will be losing.
sandy
- Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 10:17:27 (PST)

Macca - So your saying the Dons Draw is a Fix, more utter rubish being posted. Think you will find that for a person to have a pay-off they would need to be under contract. - As me being to close to as you call it 'elitest supporters' utter tosh,
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 07:37:32 (PST)

Paul, Just open your eyes for christ sake..you are too closely connected to the "elitist" supporters of the club, How much revenue has been lost being knocked out in early stages of the cup compititions, how many fans have stoped attending games my estimate is 500, even giving away child free tickets didn't boost the club because people wanna watch "Entertaining football". I am sure their is a clause Andersons that says the club can get rid of him any time, JUST LIKE PLAYERS without them being paid off, It seems that the club is not listening to the Supporters that Actually PAY to watch the football instead of giving freebie tickets to the Elitist members of the supporters, and another thing, Who officiates the draw for the the dons bond prizes...I bet it's not done by an outside solicitor that can prove that these this are all above board because we have seen many of the High profile elitist members winning, sure you pays your money and your wins your prizes but some are more lucky (if thats the correct word) then others
macca@hotmail.com
- Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 07:07:16 (PST)

No, I took Withe as an extreme example but the basic theme remains - things sometimes need changing. I'm actually unsure whether DA should be sacked or not. Give him some more time probably but things need to improve soon
Dave
- Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 06:28:04 (PST)

So can I get this right your now comparing Dave Anderson's record for this season to Peter Withe's? if so I think you have got your dates wrong and your 3 months and 1 week early.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 06:04:04 (PST)

Of course sometimes you have to act before the season is out eg Peter Withe
Dave Hill
- Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 04:53:01 (PST)

Surrely you cant judge a season until the end as that is ultimatley what counts. For example will Hampton & Richmond have had a good season if after the brilliant start they had they miss out on promotion?
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 03:05:48 (PST)

1 thing we should certainly have done is made better progress - eg we should be doing ALOT better than the other promoted teams eg Walton and H where we are basically the same and BROMLEY who we are just shading.
Dave H
- Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 02:33:00 (PST)

So it would makee good business sense to get rid of a manager and employ a new one in effect having to pay wages o 2 managers. If you really think a managr in 7th place in the league is doing a bad job you wouldn't get anyonee to take the job or be in it very long.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 02:29:28 (PST)

I agree, the reason why the crowds are going down is because of the poor football and tactics employed by Anderson, for every 100 fans that don't come the club is losing £900 plus other takings, Is it really good business sense to keep Anderson on if he is losing the club so much money because of his poor tactics in alot of the games, people pay their money to be Entertained not feel like they have been robbed by the promise of Entertainment and Excitement. Anderson always talks like he knows what he is doing but reality is being proven by him not being a very good tactician but brilliant in PR.
Don
- Friday, December 23, 2005 at 13:02:45 (PST)

Worried don - A large number of people dont 'care' about the reserve team, having a basic understanding of qualification rules for competitions I cant see anything obvious why we have not met them also it's only in the last day or so that the Surrey FA have updated the draw on their site as when the rumour first appeared I checked and we were still down to play Coney Hall, this has now been changed. From the team news for last weeks game on the o/s "Simon Sobihy is ruled out with a cheekbone fracture".
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Friday, December 23, 2005 at 10:36:35 (PST)

I would like to know why the club has not announced that the reserves have been thrown out of Surrey Cup for fielding an ineligible player and also been called up before the FA for administration irregularities. Also Sobihy was missing on Tuesday after getting his jaw broken last week on a club night out. If this is supposed to be a fans club how come this sort of information is lept from us?
Worried Don
- Friday, December 23, 2005 at 09:51:53 (PST)

Yep, Paul won 2nd Prize, you pays your money and you win your prizes....Mind you most high profile supporters have won, Roger Dennis, Jonesy, Now Paul...You guys must tell us your secret.
.
- Friday, December 23, 2005 at 09:16:13 (PST)

There is a certain manager out of work at the moment - Dave "Harry" Bassett. Just a thought.....
Colin Green
Weybridge, - Friday, December 23, 2005 at 08:07:25 (PST)

I didnt go in mid week so cant comment on this particular game. however, a few generalisations. DA seems to talk a good game but there are too many poor performances. Lets face it, we should be fairing better and most managers would have won promotion with our resources last year. DA also seems to purchase only midgets which will struggle against big opposition. Why do we keep changing formation too? Keep to a 442 please. DA's management is definitely up for question and the jury is out. If he cant get us up then another should be given a go. I also believe attaendances are down due to poor entertainment at times
Dave Hill
- Friday, December 23, 2005 at 06:19:41 (PST)

Paul, is that you who won the second place in the draw ?. if so perhaps you could help pay for the players wages, as you seem to think they deserve it. Paul please come out into the real world, come and stand in the terraces at a match and perhaps you would see what ius realy going on. We all want to win etc, but we all know its not going to happen this season, but come on, lets see some proper football and give a reasonable account of ourselves, maybe a moaning old bugger but i will still be there come rain or shine. COME ON YOU DONS.
andyneale (a battersea don,now a wansdworth don)
- Friday, December 23, 2005 at 05:25:00 (PST)

Got to agree with Jono.......the thing that baffles me at the moment with DA is that we're seeing no progress at all imo........we dont pass the ball well and haven't for ages, and we dont seem to have found a system that suits the players hes signed. I always think that opposing sides look more organised than we do as well and have a better shape, which makes me wonder what DA talks to them about in training as every game Im left wondering what's going on?
Lloydy
- Friday, December 23, 2005 at 03:22:07 (PST)

Jonno - don't suppose you're driving to the game on boxing day and if so do you think I could scrounge a lift??!!! I'll chip in for petrol and keep you amused by singing showtunes...
mackster
Ashtead, - Friday, December 23, 2005 at 01:49:10 (PST)

Did the majority of supporters think we would storm through this division? No, Get promotion via the play-offs? No. - Too many people play fantasy football yes everyone would like to sign the best players going but these players cost money and you might not like it but out Budget isint the biggest. - The only player who was on trial with us in pre-season who I have since seen and looks decent was Andy Douglas who is now at Wingate, speaking to the Wingate people it was October before he was anywhere near fit enough to play. The list of players given as to get rid of is very strange, most people like Sargent now and can see the job he does, Finnie does well. someone talked about Tinkering with the team, this has mainly been down to injuries and suspensions where you dont really have a choice.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Friday, December 23, 2005 at 00:02:15 (PST)

I will say it again. The team we have will NOT get us up this season because 1) they are too light weight 2) lack quality 3) the team is constantly tinkered with 4) we need a tall / strong holding central midfielder. Basically these players have to go: woolner,Farr, Sargant,Finnie, Sohiby and a few others. Do we seriously think we will get promoted with this lot? Come on Dave use your alledged connections in the game!!! Go on prove us wrong. We want success.
don don
- Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 23:25:29 (PST)

Paul. The game on tuesday was rubbish,and if you don't think so, then we must have seen different games, And on saturday was better but I always felt that St, Albans could go up a gear or two if they had to, So don't kid yourself the team is not good ,and DA sorry to say he is not good enough for us.
SANDY
- Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 09:37:49 (PST)

Jonno - I think their may be special rules that allow loans that we are taking advantage of.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 09:32:03 (PST)

So we've been conned by T&;M. Thought we were putting Ammo out on loan only to find T&;M have signed him. T&;M say Ryman clubs can't loan to eavh other - what about Urs and Wealdstone? Who cocked this up - or are T&;M pulling afast one? Understand Ammo still wants to play for us.
Jonno
Ashtead, - Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 08:30:36 (PST)

On the one side DA has a lot of players out and has not been able to put out a settled side. On the other side I think he tends to play the best individual 11 players rather than the best balances team. My moans from the last few games are below are to be honest, I can count on the one hand the games we have played well as a team over the last two seasons. DA please prove me wrong. Leyton sat back for the draw with 9 men behind the ball, we did not push forward to get the goal, keeping 3 or 4 men at the back marking their one man. Hendon league: played brilliantly against weak team until they kicked us off the pitch (with a weak ref), we should have beefed up the midfield early in the second half with Moore to combat their aggression. Fowler, although he didn’t score many goals his aggressive style and good touch made room for RB and the rest of the team. Played sig part in H&;R and Fisher game which were two of the best balanced performances this season. Poss he left for non football reasons. Shane is extremely good but needs more aggression. He got very annoyed and angry in Trophy game and played a lot better for it. Can someone work on his aggression
Pete
- Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 01:21:14 (PST)

So On Saturday we have one post about the game when other site all thought we played very well, but after Tuesday's game everyone comes out saying it was rubish. - It also seeems that players shouldd almost be on performance related pay! This plan is unworkable on a number of reasons one of the main one's being that the players are paid on weekly basis so you would have to take two games into account, also you wouldn't get any players signing up to that sort of deal, just like you wouldn't if your employer offered you that.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 00:29:52 (PST)

I agree DA is not up to the job. I keep hearing about the budget, but to be honest with the players that DA is bringing in, the budget should be very small as most of them can't play, they can't put more than 2 passes together which is really sad,they never play the ball from the goalkeeper upwards, the goalkeeper always kicks the ball upfield,and with our players been so tall? we always manage to get the ball, ha ha ha.Peaple a starting to vote with their feet.
sandy
- Wednesday, December 21, 2005 at 13:41:49 (PST)

At last !!! Many of the fans are now seeing what many of us have been saying for a while...Dave Anderson is NOT upto the challenge of being a manager who talks the talk along with walking the walk, He has fantastic connections in the game but cannot mustre a decent side under his direction even if he was given the best players in the division, lets face it, Players don't play because of poor tactics and training...This is a fact cos you see it week in week out...Show us you are a quality manager Anderson...Make your players unbeaten until the end of the year...Show us that you are a quality manager and not just good at "talking a good game"
.
- Wednesday, December 21, 2005 at 13:13:36 (PST)

At least some good news about the debt being eased - £440,000 now. How much difference would £60,000 mean in practical terms (how much less per month?)anyone know?
Mark Leadon
- Wednesday, December 21, 2005 at 12:51:49 (PST)

Too Embarrassed - you don't have to pay to watch that c**p like we (835!) fans did. Is it any wonder the fan base is dwindling match by match when such abysmal fare is served up in the pretence of 'entertainment'? "A pound a cup" it says on the OS [referring to the (accidental??)overcharging of hot drinks] it might well apply to the admission charges for Cup games in the future if this is what we can expect. It would appear that we fans are getting mugged from all sides.
Woking Womble
- Wednesday, December 21, 2005 at 10:55:59 (PST)

At the end of the day DA takes the blame too.
too embarrased
- Wednesday, December 21, 2005 at 03:51:30 (PST)

What a load of rubbish last night,the players were a disgace to the name of Wimbledon, the only one I thought put anything into it was Richard B, you could see the frustration on his face every time the others tried to pass to him and they mucked it up, also why cant AFCW put together a reasonable programe, again a load of rubbish, surely a programe could have been put together of a couple of pages, altogether last night was a load of rubbish and a waste of time and money, ( I hope no players picked up there wages last night DA)
andyneale (a battersea don,now a wansdworth don)
- Wednesday, December 21, 2005 at 03:44:27 (PST)

Just cme back from the game,what can I say?. I'm sorry to say I'm losing faith with DA. The players that he brings to the club, the team has no presence about it,we must be one of the smallest team in the league,if not the smallest, and all we do is pump the ball up in the air. On today's swhowing we should get paid to see that,not the other way round.
sandy
- Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 14:10:50 (PST)

WHAT IS THE TXT NUMBER
NICK50MEGS HFC
- Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 12:08:56 (PST)

We were robbed big time on Saturday,it should at least been a draw.The ref had lost the plot?.
DONNA WRATE
MORDEN, SURREY - Monday, December 19, 2005 at 07:07:28 (PST)

Cracking game, really enjoyed it and liked the fight we showed. After that game I came away thinking we can still give the playoffs a good fight and looking at the table all we need is a good run. Lets keep the faith. Great to see the wizard back again, his touch is superb.
jakedon11
- Monday, December 19, 2005 at 01:18:41 (PST)

good to know my home still gonig
henry.smith <walsall@aapt.net.au>
penrith, nsw australia - Sunday, December 18, 2005 at 21:49:47 (PST)

Big John - To be fair behind the west bank in it's current state is not really safe, also is not the clubs land forms part of the famous second lease. Regarding Dartford we wern't kept in for 15 minutes it was about 2 minutes in the end the announcement were very strange to say the least. How long were you kept in yesterday 5 minutes? I upose after a game that has had aa bit of an edge to it the sstewards want to make sure everyone gets out safetly so if it takes 5 minutes when a large away crowd like yesterday visit is that a hardship?
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Sunday, December 18, 2005 at 11:45:50 (PST)

Terrific game yesterday, the most exciting of the season. I won't comment on the refereeing, which must have put back the cause of gender equality by some years. However, one simple plea to the club - can we open the gate behind the West Bank on the John Smith's side? It's been opened before at the end of games, so there's no reason it can't be done again. Being kept inside our own ground so the stewards can clear away the St Albanians first is not just inconvenient, but a bit insulting. You'll recall that Dartford, for example, let their own hoolies out first and kept us inside for 15 minutes after the apology for a game at Gravesend.
Big John
UK - Sunday, December 18, 2005 at 09:58:37 (PST)

Just wondered when rugby tackling became allowed in football? How was that not given! The biggest cert penalty ever!
Dave Hill
- Sunday, December 18, 2005 at 07:58:11 (PST)

First Ursell, now Kouman. Hes gone to Tooting & Mitcham until the end of the season. First of all I'm shocked (I suppose people should be used to this by now.) Heres the DA Quote about it: "There’s no doubting Amo’s ability, but he needs six or seven weeks of football to get him back to the level we need him to be at, and our reserves just don’t have enough fixtures. Also, from a budget point of view, it doesn’t make sense to have Amo in the reserves. Tooting came to take him until the end of the season and we’ve accepted.” So why is he there until the end of the season? Can we put in a 7 day approach when we want him back?
don
- Saturday, December 17, 2005 at 09:24:37 (PST)

Don, agree with you about plummer, been saying it for a couple of weeks now, he seems to lose interest after the first 30 mins and gives up. And as for what DA says about some of these new players, i'm still waiting to see what fantastic football they are supposed to play, but as we don't choose the team, we will have to keep cheering them on and hope for a good result. see you all saturday.
andyneale (a battersea don,now a wansdworth don)
- Friday, December 16, 2005 at 05:47:10 (PST)

The only positive thing about having 2 midfielders suspeneded is that hopefully Daley will play there and not be wasted at the back at the back.
Richard B another Wiltshire Don
- Friday, December 16, 2005 at 03:27:27 (PST)

Plummer started with a flash and I thought, hey this lad is good. Since then he has seemed uninterested, I wonder if he is carrying a knock or not finding it as enjoyable as he first thought. He is not a right winger, cause he is left footed and looks more comfortable as part of a three centre mids. Having said this I really want all the fans to get behind the team tomorrow. We face a hard task and need the kind of fight we showed at Sutton last season. COME ON YOU DONS!!!!
jakedon11
- Friday, December 16, 2005 at 03:06:01 (PST)

Yes this is a strange one. People tell us that he is irreplacable and will stop Rob getting back in the team, DA told us 'He excites me - when he gets the ball you are on the edge of your seat in anticipation'. I really do wish that was the case. On the one hand he has got in some good players in Howard, Ursell, Butler, Daley, Little etc. but also a rather long string of not good enough players...so which is Plummer going to be. If I had a seat I would love to be on the edge of it but think it unlikely after his first 10 games.
Richard B another Wiltshire Don
- Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 08:20:00 (PST)

OK I said what I thought about Matt Fowler last week, and within 24 hours he was on his bike. So therefore I will now say what I think about Plummer. I perdict Plummer will be on his way within the next week. When he scored against Ash he looked disinterested in his celebration (what the hell was that all about, what was he trying to prove.)
don
- Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 07:30:03 (PST)

Ash highlights on http://www.donsonline.co.uk/php/index.php including Goodbye Matt (not in ZIP file)
Strawberry <strawberry@donsonline.co.uk>
- Wednesday, December 14, 2005 at 11:48:03 (PST)

Coney Hall v AFC Wimbledon Res (Surrey Premier Cup). A CCL pay day wont stop us this time.
The Coney
- Tuesday, December 13, 2005 at 10:17:41 (PST)

Don - difficult one but never seem to be as many injuries of course this could just translate that our players are 'Soft' :)
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Monday, December 12, 2005 at 09:48:19 (PST)

I have certainly heard DA say about our games are more intense than the other games. But I'm not convinced sending him off to Wealdstone was the right thing to do, and it doesn't usually happen. Whats your impression when you have gone to some Fisher games? Oh, and yes the jumping off the cliff bit was a joke. :-)
don
- Monday, December 12, 2005 at 09:28:02 (PST)

Don - Ha Ha very funny, talk to the majority of players who now play for other clubs they will confirm that challenges made on our players are a lot harder than in other games. Your suggestion of jumping off a cliff is stupid and do i agree with everything the club does NO, but you wont believe that so it doesnt matter.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Monday, December 12, 2005 at 09:21:08 (PST)

Paul theres a CHANCE that Rob Ursell COULD come on and get injured. Theres also a CHANCE he COULD get injured at Wealdstone. Theres a CHANCE he COULD get injured at training. Theres a CHANCE he COULD get injured having a kickabout in a park, with 2 other AFC Wimbledon players. Theres a CHANCE he COULD get injured playing in his own back garden, etc etc etc. The nature of injuries is that they are usually accidents, and therefore UNPERDICTABLE. Why is it more likely he WOULD get injured, at Kingsmeadow, by trying to overdo it? Whats your basis on that post? I'm sure the management and players are patient enough to take no notice of the fans (or at least they should be.) Finally if DA said that if Rob Ursells best way to get match fit, was to jump off a cliff, would you agree with him? Infact do you ever disagree with anything the club does?
don
- Monday, December 12, 2005 at 09:03:46 (PST)

Paul - Croydon Athletic
andyneale (a battersea don)
- Monday, December 12, 2005 at 05:48:14 (PST)

hello Paul. It must have been a good game 2-11
sandy
- Saturday, December 10, 2005 at 13:54:28 (PST)

Andy - Athletic or f.c? i thought the suggestion was he was going to carshalton?
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Friday, December 09, 2005 at 13:10:00 (PST)

Matt Fowler has just signed for croydon
andyneale (a battersea don)
- Friday, December 09, 2005 at 09:14:49 (PST)

'Rob would come on,get injured and be out for the rest of the season but at least some of therowd would go home happy!' What a truly bizarre thing to say.
Richard B another Wiltshire Don
- Friday, December 09, 2005 at 07:59:33 (PST)

Can you imagine what our games would be like i Rob was sitting on the bench for 75 minutes, a section of the crowd would be screaming all game for him to be used Rob would come on wanting to do well over do it and get injured and be out for the rest of the season, but atleast a section of the crowd would go home happy! Let him finish his reabilitation off and then when he comes back he will have been gained that all important extensive playing time. - He is talking to Mike Rayner on a regular basis wwho is making sure he comes back in tip top shape.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Thursday, December 08, 2005 at 00:13:05 (PST)

Yes but we are not saying he should only play for the reserves but could play parts for the first team. Still at teh current rate of success of players he'll probably be off by the end of the week.
Richard B another Wiltshire Don
- Wednesday, December 07, 2005 at 10:29:21 (PST)

I'm sorry it didn't work out for Matt Fowler; my first impression of him was that his hold up play was better than any other forward we have/had at the club and he worked hard. He seemed to regress rather than improve - I guess his fitness and problems getting a long run in the first team as outlined by DA meant we probably didn't see the best of him. I hope he has better luck at his next club.
Rick
- Wednesday, December 07, 2005 at 10:28:34 (PST)

don - it is usual for a player who has been out for a long time to get fit playing for the reserves then possibly to be reintroduced to the first team as sub. If Rob played for the reserves he'd be playing largely against the reserves of lower league teams. Playing for Wealdstone he's playing close to the standard he'd have to be at for our first team (based on what others have said about non-AFCW Ryamn Prem games being less intense).
Rick
- Wednesday, December 07, 2005 at 10:19:17 (PST)

I agree we did not see the best of Matt, but have to reiterate that the best of Matt was in the home game with Croydon Ath. where they used his pace and close control by feeding him along the ground all the time. I fear we are returning to the Jamie Taylor debate of if we have a speedy short forward, is it a good idea to endlessly pump inaccurate high balls to him. Predictably the answer begins with N. It also may just be the mentality of the club but just how many players do we get in, say they are going to be wonderful, and two months later they leave. Roddis was a frustrating one but Andrew Martin was teh biggest waste of time since DA arrived and that is up against some pretty strong competition.
Richard B another Wiltshire Don
- Wednesday, December 07, 2005 at 01:34:27 (PST)

Well it looks as though DA agrees with me over Matt Fowler. Hes left the club. I have to say, I do wish Matt all the best, etc etc etc, but I just never felt he was good enough here. My post saying "1 goal, 1 sending off" yesterday just basically was me reflecting on why I didn't think he was good enough. He may be a good player, but he just hasn't done it here. So who will replace Matt. Well DA says he is talking to two strikers. One from the conference south, and one from a lower league. BTW how about getting Jermaine Beckford from Wealdstone. Or Cliff Akurang from Heybridge. Or Richard Jolly from Wealdstone (I hear hes good friends with Rob Ursell.) Or James Dyden from Folkestone Invicta. These are all strikers who I believe could improve the squad, playing for worst clubs than us (i.e. they are below us in the league.) If DA is after strikers perhaps going after one of these could help us improve the squad.
don
- Tuesday, December 06, 2005 at 10:56:05 (PST)

But Rick isn't it pretty normal for a club to keep a player, so they can get back to match fitness? Also DA was the one that gave the quote about Rob Ursell turning a game with about 15 minutes to go, not any of us lot.
don
- Tuesday, December 06, 2005 at 10:01:39 (PST)

It has nothing to do with Rob turning everything around and us winning the Trophy because of him. My feeling and I think of many who seem to have deserted the club in recent months is that we are incredibly dull to watch and any extra skill, flair, imagination, spark etc. would be more than welcome. I also want to see what he can do at a higher level.
Richard B another Wiltshire Don
- Tuesday, December 06, 2005 at 04:13:29 (PST)

I can't believe the fuss being made about Rob going on loan for a month; he hasn't played competitive football for about 6 months, last season after a shorter spell out it took him a good 6-8 weeks before he begain to look anything like his old self and that was at a lower level. All this talk about Rob single handedly wining games with 20 minutes on the pitch is not only unrealistic but putting far too much weight on one player's shoulders and probably highlights just why it's a good idea for him to get match fit away from these unrealistic expectations.
Rick
- Tuesday, December 06, 2005 at 02:47:45 (PST)

There have been plenty of opportunities to bring on Rob for as long as was necessary, and help the team. He could easily have played 20 minutes against Redbridge. Of course we would not have started him against Leyton but brought him on if the team just happened to be creating no scoring chances whatsoever. We have a few cup games where teams put out 'lesser sides' where again he could have played any length of time DA wanted under the watchful eye of Mike Rayner. How can going to Wealdstone be any more helpful than these? My problem with The Chester situation is that personally MW was, is and never will be likely at all to be of League standard and to send RU up, having already having had interested shown by another League club (we all know who), he could easily have done well enough for them to show an interest in him and so the injury was the lesser of the two evils. We had very little to gain from it as with the current RU situation. Of course after all my protestations about him when he comes back he will probably be rubbish!
Richard B another Wiltshire Don
- Tuesday, December 06, 2005 at 01:17:52 (PST)

Don - If wwe have to wait a few extra weeks to see The Urse back to ssomewhere near his oldself it will have been worth it. And wwith his return timed for the suspension of Gell it could all fit into place against St Albans.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Monday, December 05, 2005 at 11:20:44 (PST)

Meanwhile of course its my opinion only, but we could improve the squad by getting rid of Matt Fowler. 1 goal, 1 sending off. Not a good record is it.
don
- Monday, December 05, 2005 at 10:51:13 (PST)

but Paul often players getting back to match fitness do get 15/20 minutes here and there. Obviously Saturdays game with the sending off, might make it more difficult to do certain things in a game, by its very nature football is an unperdictable sport. But one thing I would say is that in the Redbridge game we were 5-0 up with over half an hour to go, so he could of come on then. In short, you don't know what subs you should use in a game, until the game has started, but Ursell could have come on in the Redbridge game. That DA quote from the 14th November, about theres no one you would rather have to turn a game in the last 15 minutes, link here http://www.afcwimbledon.co.uk/news.php?Psection_id=2&;Psub_section_id=2&op;=archive&monthID;=10&yearID;=2005 is not bring brought into practice, infact we seem to be doing exactly the opposite. If DA had have put Ursell on the bench on Saturday, theres no way he could have known Gell would get sent off, but sometimes you put players onto the bench incase you might be able to use them during a game. I still think we miss Rob Ursell, and can't wait for him to return.
don
- Monday, December 05, 2005 at 10:49:28 (PST)

If Urse had of been with us on Saturday against Leyton and started what would of people have done on 35 minutes when Gell had been sent off? would you have left him on knowing he wasn't match fit and taken him off after say 70 mins, knowing defending isint one of his strong points? - Or are people sugesting he would of only got 15/20 minutes in each game as a sub?
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Monday, December 05, 2005 at 10:30:06 (PST)

If Urse had gone to Chester for the trial and not got injured would of people complained? So people would of prefered Urse to not go on loan, but reports at Weadlstone say he is lacking match fitness the management team & mike rayner obviously think he is not fit eough for our first team as of yet if he had not gone on loan and played for our reserves he would of played 1 game during the 4 weeks and the game would of been nowhere near as competitive as what he has faced with wealdstone.
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Monday, December 05, 2005 at 10:08:16 (PST)

Obviously I meant Micky Woolner on trial, not on loan.
don
- Monday, December 05, 2005 at 08:00:42 (PST)

the chester city visit last season was a bit silly. Chester had orignally asked for Micky Woolner on loan, but DA only sent Rob Ursell so that Micky "would not be there on his own." But Chester didn't want Ursell. Which makes me wonder why did DA sent him up there, I can't believe hes trying to get rid of Ursell.
don
- Monday, December 05, 2005 at 07:59:15 (PST)

Couldn't agree more about Ursell. The only justification for loaning him out was if HE felt that the home fan expectation might have been too great.
Don Worn
- Monday, December 05, 2005 at 07:58:49 (PST)

Well exactly a.) why has he had to go to Wealdstone? b.) why when he played last year was he open to such abuse (however playful) from the bench? c.) how wise was the Chester visit? I cannot but feel that he is a bit too much of a natural inspirational figure for our turgid management style.
Richard B another Wiltshire Don
- Monday, December 05, 2005 at 00:55:02 (PST)

Richard B, perhaps we could do with Rob Ursell in midfield. I know hes getting match fitness at Wealdstone, but surely he could get match fitness with us. Even if it meant just coming off the bench for the last 20 minutes or so, if DA did not want to start him. Here is a quote from DA on Monday 14th November 2005. "And, if you’re looking for someone to come on and change a game with 15 minutes or so to go, I don’t think there’s anyone in this league that you would rather have." So why is he at Wealdstone. Surely yesterday was the time for a Rob Ursell "special" moment. The least that could have happened is that he didn't do anything special, which didn't happen anyway.
don
- Sunday, December 04, 2005 at 10:21:40 (PST)

Richard B, Totaly agree with you, been saying it for ages, these so called wonder players who come from higher divisions and play at lower league levels, WHY ?. is there something wrong in training, surely they should have gelled by now, the lack of communication between players needs sorting out, aswell as set peices on both sides. Sad to see Sir Matt retiring, always a great player who could be relied on, to score or to defend, a GREAT alrounder, will miss you...........
andyneale (a battersea don)
- Sunday, December 04, 2005 at 07:07:48 (PST)

Delighted to see Andy leading the MOM poll. It certainly comes to something when a good defensive performance is required at home against a relagation threatened team. Forget the Suspensions, referee, 10 men etc. this was another DISMAL creative performance. I really thought with two signings from Conf. South teams in the summer that there would be more cohesion and control in midfield and amazingly decent passing. 1 has left after 2 months as he was incapable of passing it and the other seemingly, despite a great shot, has the same trouble. We have been out passed by Leyton, Bromley and a number of other teams. We have these false dawns where we sign a player that DA has been desperate to get because he can do this and that and when we see them have to wonder what the fuss is about. The defence is solid and I have to feel because DA was a keeper that he knows what to look for but going forward its a mess with almost nothing being created for the forwards. No we don't need endless new additions but we need some decent tactics and a cohesion about the team and some simple passing and move. Questions were asked about low gates and I fear that part of it can go down to the incredibly dull way we play. Standing with very long term suppoters yesterday they were at a loss to understand what the team is trying to do and whether they actually like the way we play. Children for free next week (I agree a very good idea) but may not be cheap enough on recent showings.
Richard B another Wiltshire Don
- Sunday, December 04, 2005 at 06:27:45 (PST)

CW - With regards to the Herne Bay 1st goal - If I am not mistaken the NLP on the Sunday reported that Matt scored with a header from the edge of the box that looped over the keeper!
Paul Raymond <webmaster@itmustbedons.com>
Tooting, London England - Sunday, December 04, 2005 at 00:47:38 (PST)

With 14 minutes gone, he lost one to Bolger and the ball rolled out for a throw, some 28 yards out. Oakins launched huge effort into the box, a brief scramble ensued and Matt Everard turned sharply to fire past the scary-looking Hughes for his seventh goal of the season(from the OS)
carshalton womble
- Saturday, December 03, 2005 at 15:01:39 (PST)

You can't blame any particular player for todays poor performance because we have have a squad that just has not gelled together. The players might be okay individually but don't work as a team! Dave - changes are needed now. Again we need a strong / tall holding midfield player. All the best teams we play are big and strong...we are not! Shane must replace Fowler..it's obvious.
Crawley Don
- Saturday, December 03, 2005 at 13:47:37 (PST)

Excellent send off for Sir Matt.However I must correct you on one point.He has already had two operations,one paid for by the club and awaits a third.
Dorking Chris <chrisjdavis65@hotmail.com>
Dorking, England - Friday, December 02, 2005 at 17:24:10 (PST)

I'm not able to get to as many AFC games as I would like, so my memories of Matt Everard are limited. But in the dozen or so games I have seen him play he must have scored half a dozen goals - not bad for a defender. I have to agree with the other postings, he will long be remembered and already ranks as a Dons Legend, and it would surely be appropriate at a home game for the fans to be able to show him their appreciation in person (although it might not be so easy for him).
Old Plough Laner
Petersfield, UK - Friday, December 02, 2005 at 14:23:08 (PST)

A "coruscate" ligament injury? an interesting thought cor·us·cate ( P ) Pronunciation Key (kôr-skt, kr-) intr.v. cor·us·cat·ed, cor·us·cat·ing, cor·us·cates To give forth flashes of light; sparkle and glitter: diamonds coruscating in the candlelight. To exhibit sparkling virtuosity: a flutist whose music coruscated throughout the concert hall. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Latin coruscre, corusct-, to flash.]
Steve <aqok80@dsl.pipex.com>
hampton, uk - Friday, December 02, 2005 at 14:10:15 (PST)

Ed Don; I see you have chosen to walk to football!
TW
- Friday, December 02, 2005 at 11:58:28 (PST)

But TW, you ARE a slow, middle of the road, Sunday afternoon driver. You even have to aks where the cat's eyes are after dusk, so what's your point? Franchising:not funny. Old codgers:VERY funny!
Edinburgh Don
- Friday, December 02, 2005 at 10:31:02 (PST)

Oh right, thanks for that Jakedon11 (why the 11?!?!)
err ok
- Friday, December 02, 2005 at 08:34:42 (PST)

Sir Matt was an absolute hero and club legend and deserves a proper send off. His commitment was immense and will always be remembered in fondness by all dons.
jakedon11
- Friday, December 02, 2005 at 08:33:29 (PST)

GUTTED to read on the website that Sir Matt Everard has had to call it a day, thanks for all your time at AFC
Ian
Epsom, - Friday, December 02, 2005 at 06:34:56 (PST)

Just returned from a short break and noticed the posts about TV adverts. I agree, I'm not amused by the SAGA insurance one. It makes the older generation look like a load of slow, middle of the road, Sunday afternoon drivers. Perhaps we should ban all adverts that take a light hearted look at the world. Then we can all be miserable together.
TW
- Friday, December 02, 2005 at 05:04:35 (PST)

I did read on another guestbook that the long throw gives Finnie a back problem so I suppose he only uses it if absolutely necessary.
Rick
- Thursday, December 01, 2005 at 15:40:58 (PST)

Paul, see where you are coming from but, wayne does mix his throws and practicaly all of the fans cheered as soon as he took a throw and caused Dartford lots of problems.
andyneale (a battersea don)
- Thursday, December 01, 2005 at 07:50:38 (PST)